- Rooftop radiative cooling system could provide lighting power when solar energy is unavailable.
- The system uses commercially available technology and could eventually help meet the need for nighttime lighting in urban areas or provide lighting in developing countries.
Researchers have designed an off-grid, low-cost modular energy source that can efficiently produce power at night. The system uses commercially available technology and could eventually help meet the need for nighttime lighting in urban areas or provide lighting in developing countries.
Although solar power brings many benefits, its use depends heavily on the distribution of sunlight, which can be limited in many locations and is completely unavailable at night. Systems that store energy produced during the day are typically expensive, thus driving up the cost of using solar power.
To find a less-expensive alternative, researchers led by Shanhui Fan from Stanford University looked to radiative cooling. This approach uses the temperature difference resulting from heat absorbed from the surrounding air and the radiant cooling effect of cold space to generate electricity.
In The Optical Society (OSA) journal Optics Express, the researchers theoretically demonstrate an optimized radiative cooling approach that can generate 2.2 Watts per square meter with a rooftop device that doesn’t require a battery or any external energy. This is about 120 times the amount of energy that has been experimentally demonstrated and enough to power modular sensors such as ones used in security or environmental applications.
“We are working to develop high-performance, sustainable lighting generation that can provide everyone — including those in developing and rural areas — access to reliable and sustainable low cost lighting energy sources,” said Lingling Fan, first author of the paper. “A modular energy source could also power off-grid sensors used in a variety of applications and be used to convert waste heat from automobiles into usable power.”
Maximizing power generation
One of the most efficient ways to generate electricity using radiative cooling is to use a thermoelectric power generator. These devices use thermoelectric materials to generate power by converting the temperature differences between a heat source and the device’s cool side, or radiative cooler, into an electric voltage.
In the new work, the researchers optimized each step of thermoelectric power generation to maximize nighttime power generation from a device that would be used on a rooftop. They improved the energy harvesting so that more heat flows into the system from the surrounding air and incorporate new commercially available thermoelectric materials that enhance how well that energy is used by the device. They also calculated that a thermoelectric power generator covering one square meter of a rooftop could achieve the best trade-off between heat loss and thermoelectric conversion.
“One of the most important innovations was designing a selective emitter that is attached to the cool side of the device,” said Wei Li, a member of the research team. “This optimizes the radiative cooling process so that the power generator can more efficiently get rid of excessive heat.”
The researchers demonstrated the new approach by using computer modeling to simulate a system with realistic physical parameters. The models reproduced previous experimental results faithfully and revealed that the optimized system designed by the researchers could come close to what has been calculated as the maximum efficiency using thermoelectric conversion.
In addition to carrying out experiments, the researchers are also examining optimal designs for operating the system during the day, in addition to nighttime, which could expand the practical applications of the system.
This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02-07ER46426.
LCOE – Designing for Value – Specify the Objective and work backwards from that.
Shanhui Fan and team thank you and congratulations on your research.
Just because we can though as designers, does not imply that we should. Worthy design must fully satisfy well considered objectives. Less than this simply does not cut it in the modern era, and this thinking applies particularly to power conversion science.
Your paper indicates a device that can generate 2.2 Watts per square meter of rooftop installation, has been developed as a starting point for the technology so far. Compared with the current energy density and small footprint of a simple lead acid or li-ion cell for example, what you have described is not that encouraging, and the many magnitudes necessary for it to impress by comparison on a the basis of W/m2 installed, would seem incomprehensible moving the design forward.
Appropriately balancing the trade offs and costs between improved power density and better power efficiency ensures that power systems designs deliver the highest value design for customers. This is a critical metric (also known as LCOE) that should underpin power tech design at every level including component parts to total integrated solutions.
Also, new power focussed research ideas should always reference an LCOE pathway graph as standard, that points out the key milestones being sought along the technology development journey to reach a mature LCOE point that enables critical analysis and comparison with alternative power technologies operating in this global space, directly and side by side.
Chasing power conversion efficiency percentage can become a game of diminishing returns unless the improvement results in micro size products.
Power density is a useful metric for converters, but should be considered carefully to include all elements in the total solution.