- Researchers studying two solar parks, situated in arid locations, found they produced 'cool islands' extending around 700 meters from the solar park boundaries.
- The temperature of the surrounding land surface was reduced by up to 2.3 degrees at 100 meters away from the solar park, with the cooling effects reducing exponentially to 700 meters.
- This new discovery is important as it shows the solar park could impact ecological processes, including productivity, decomposition, and ultimately the carbon balance, in the surrounding landscape.
As more countries pledge to achieve net-zero carbon emissions there will be a greater reliance on renewable energy sources, such as wind turbines and solar energy. However, there is very little evidence on the impacts large-scale solar farms have on the local environment. It is therefore really important to understand climate impacts as this affects the ecological responses.
The team of scientists, from Lancaster University, Ludong University in China, and the University of California Davis in the USA focused on two large-scale solar parks located in arid locations — the 300 MW Stateline solar park in California USA, and the 850 MW Longyangxia solar park in China.
The researchers used land surface temperature data derived from Landsat satellite images, an approach not previously applied to solar parks. This enabled the study team to compare the land surface temperatures around solar parks before and after the solar parks were constructed. The satellite data was supplemented by on-the-ground temperature measurements around Stateline solar park.
They found that the parks produced ‘cool islands’ extending around 700 metres from the solar park boundaries. The temperature of the surrounding land surface was reduced by up to 2.3 ℃ at 100 metres away from the solar park, with the cooling effects reducing exponentially to 700 metres.
This new discovery is important as it shows the solar park could impact ecological processes, including productivity, decomposition, and ultimately the carbon balance, in the surrounding landscape. The scale of effect will depend on the location and could be positive, negative or inconsequential.
For example, previous studies have shown that lower surface temperatures on the Tibetan Plateau could potentially reduce the amount of methane lost to the atmosphere. However, in the Mojave Desert, lower temperatures resulted in fewer seeds germinating, which may mean fewer plants surviving to adulthood, reducing biodiversity.
The new findings, therefore, highlight the need for greater consideration to be given to where solar parks are built around the world, as well as their design, to minimize any negative impacts and boost positive effects.
Dr. Alona Armstrong, the co-lead author from Lancaster University, said: “Most studies examine the impacts of land-use change for solar parks inside the site boundaries. Here, we found a temperature effect that is evident up to around 700 metres away, suggesting that ecological processes may also be impacted.
“This heightens the importance of understanding the implications of renewable energy technologies on the hosting landscape — we need to ensure that the energy transition does not cause undue damage to ecological systems and ideally has net positive consequences on the places where we build them.”
Although further studies are needed to determine the exact mechanisms that cause the cool island effect and how it might vary with location and solar park design, the researchers hypothesize it is due to the solar arrays shading and insulating the land surface, as well as energy being converted into electricity by the solar panels.
—
Publication Referenced in the Article:
Li Guoqing, Rebecca R Hernandez, George Alan Blackburn, Gemma Davies, Merryn Hunt, James Duncan Whyatt, Alona Armstrong. Ground-mounted photovoltaic solar parks promote land surface cool islands in arid ecosystems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2021; 1: 100008 DOI: 10.1016/j.rset.2021.100008
—
This article was written by Lancaster University. It was originally published here.
Comments